Raytac nRF52810 Module Incorporated AT Command Over UART Service (NUS) Coming Soon!

UART Service (NUS) is the most convenient and common Bluetooth Lower Energy proprietary service for all developers.
Raytac has introduced NUS (UART) BT4.2 and BT5 solution in previous article.

MDBT42Q-P192K-nRF52810 Nordic.jpg

nRF52 series SoC has below features rather than nRF51
1. nRF52 supports Longer Package MTU
(500 Bytes for Baudrate 9600 / over 10K for 115200 or 230400)
2. nRF 52 has over 10 times higher transmission speed than nRF51
3. nRF52 only needs 1/10 (or less) transmission time  than nRF51
 
Raytac has been hearing from developers about the demand of AT command over UART service based on Nordic Solution.
Learnt from customers’ feedback, Raytac realized that Long Package MTU is the recent critical demand for all customers and IoT applications.
As such, Raytac hardware team has selected Nordic nRF52810 solution , powered by firmware design team to develop a coming AT Command Over UART Service Solution.
The features of the AT Command Over UART solution not only brings a cost effective module, but an easy and user familiar method enables an easy and time-to-market efficiency.
Nordic nRF52810 module part no.
MDBT42Q-P192K (PCB Antenna Version)
MDBT42Q-192K (Ceramic Antenna Version)
 
Nordic nRF52810 AT Command Module-MDBT42Q-PAT
44195865 – abstract molecule structure on dark blue color background. vector illustration of communication – network for futuristic technology concept
Raytac Corporation
A BT4.1 & BT4.2 & BT5 module maker based on Nordic nRF51 & nRF52 solution 
(nRF51822 & nRF51422 & nRF52832 & nR52810 & nRF52840)
www.raytac.com            Tel: +886.2.3234.0208
email: service@raytac.com

nRF51 or nRF52? MTU Packet is the question!

To pursue a higher speed, performance, and functionality is eternal prospect of technology moving on.

Inevitably, the payoff in term of cost of the the technology improvement is essential.
Nordic has launched various of BLE SoC such as nRF51822, nRF52832, and nRF52840.
Raytac recently has been asked frequently~How we can decide to use nRF51 or nR52?
Which solution is the best adoption for the implement?
Is the best and latest solution always the right option for developers?